Navi Logo 2.png
Navi Close.svg

Blogs

AUSIT members involved in making juries more inclusive

INDUSTRY PROGRESS

In April 2021, the Victorian Law Reform Commission (VLRC) interviewed AUSIT’s Immediate Past President Erika Gonzalez Garcia and Auslan interpreter Meredith Bartlett for their Inclusive Juries review. We asked Meredith to tell us a little about the resulting report, which was released in mid-May.

Large Image High Res

Taking part … is one of the highlights of my membership of AUSIT 

This report is a major breakthrough, as it recommends ‘changes to the law and practice to enable people who are deaf, hard of hearing, blind or have low vision to serve on juries’.

The report found that although Victorian laws are ‘generally up to date and reflect the outlook of the community’, they effectively exclude ‘those who are deaf, hard of hearing, blind or have low vision’ from jury service and are therefore ‘out of step with local community expectations [and] inconsistent with international standards’.

It states that ‘the law in Victoria lags behind many countries in which inclusive juries have been a reality for many years’, and that ‘enabling people who are deaf, hard of hearing, blind or have low vision to serve on juries is well overdue.’

Key recommendations:

1) ‘changes to the Juries Act and jury processes to ensure that people get the reasonable adjustments they need to be able to serve – such as Auslan interpreters, speech-to-text translations or screen readers’ and

2) limiting the ‘13th person rule’ (which prevents anyone who isn’t a juror from entering the jury room) ‘so that interpreters and support persons can go in[to] the jury room if they take an oath to maintain confidentiality, not participate personally in deliberations, and interpret truthfully.’

The VLRC’s Chair, the Hon. Tony North KC, points out that jury duty is ‘an important civic duty, and people who are deaf, hard of hearing, blind or have low vision should be able to participate like everyone else. This reform will make juries more representative.’

As an Auslan interpreter I thoroughly enjoyed working with spoken language interpreters and translators to achieve some of the changes over time. I can only hope that the slow and steady campaign will continue to achieve change.

The provision of support people with appropriate training to attend the jury room is just common sense and should not be used as an excuse to pose another barrier to people who face barriers every single day of their lives.

In Australia we believe in the jury system of justice, where 12 ordinary people represent the community and make decisions on the guilt or otherwise of an alleged offender. It is a breach of human rights to exclude anyone from this process only because they have a vision or hearing impairment, or require another person to provide a visual interpretation or an auditory description.

Taking part in this review is one of the highlights of my membership of AUSIT, along with chairing the Victorian Branch for a few years.

Dr Meredith Bartlett is a practising Auslan interpreter, interpreter educator, and researcher in tactile Auslan at Monash University. She has taught Auslan/English interpreters at RMIT for over 25 years, and has published in the field of linguistics of tactile Auslan as used by deafblind signers in Australia.

You can download the Inclusive Juries report here, and view an Auslan version of the Executive Summary here.

You can also read the research – carried out by another past president of AUSIT, Sandra Hale and colleagues – that laid the foundation for this change here.

Submission form

for court interpreters to report incidents or issues that occur in court interpreting assignments.

Purpose and function of this information submission form.

This form enables you to report issues or problems that you encounter in the course of court interpreting assignments. These issues and problems will be collected by AUSIT to report to the JCCD (the Judicial Council on Cultural Diversity) to monitor the implementation of the Recommended National Standards. The reporting of these issues and problems enables AUSIT to work with the JCCD to suggest steps to address these issues and to avoid the repetition of these problems in the future.

  • Details of interpreter and court interpreting assignment

    (These details will be retained by AUSIT only. These details will not be passed on to JCDI):

  • MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • Your interpreting assignment experience

    (These details may be shared with JCDI. If you do not wish for a specific piece of information to be made available to the JCDI, please make this clear.)

  • Give details of what you wish to report on in chronological order below (NOTE: you can access the Recommended National Standards here)
  • Thank you for taking the time to report your experience. It will assist us in advocating for interpreters to be treated as the skilled and experienced professionals that we are. Your feedback is welcome.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share This

Select your desired option below to share a direct link to this page